Have you ever asked yourself where the universe came from? Why
everything exists instead of just nothing? Typically atheists have said
the universe is just eternal, and that's all.
Does God exist? This is one of the most important questions a person can
consider. Your belief in the existence of God has enormous implications
on your views of life, humanity, morality, and destiny. In this
article, Dr. Craig offers three reasons why life would be meaningless
without God and then presents five strong arguments for the existence of
God, demonstrating the reasonableness of believing that God exists.
But surely this is
unreasonable. Just think about it a minute. If the universe never had a
beginning, that means that the number of past events in the history of
the universe is infinite. But mathematicians recognize that the
existence of an actually infinite number of things leads to
self-contradictions. For example, what is infinity minus infinity? Well,
mathematically, you get self-contradictory answers. This shows that
infinity is just an idea in your mind, not something that exists in
reality. David Hilbert, perhaps the greatest mathematician of the
twentieth century, states,
The infinite
is nowhere to be found in reality. It neither exists in nature nor
provides a legitimate basis for rational thought. The role that remains
for the infinite to play is solely that of an idea.
But that entails that since past events are not just ideas, but are
real, the number of past events must be finite. Therefore, the series of
past events can't go back forever; rather the universe must have begun
to exist.
This conclusion has been confirmed by remarkable
discoveries in astronomy and astrophysics. In one of the most startling
developments of modern science, we now have pretty strong evidence that
the universe is not eternal in the past but had an absolute beginning
about 13 billion years ago in a cataclysmic event known as the Big Bang.
What makes the Big Bang so startling is that it represents the origin
of the universe from literally nothing. For all matter and energy, even
physical space and time themselves, came into being at the Big Bang. As
the physicist P. C. W. Davies explains, "the coming into being of the
universe, as discussed in modern science . . . is not just a matter of
imposing some sort of organization . . . upon a previous incoherent
state, but literally the coming-into-being of all physical things from
nothing."
Of course, alternative theories have been crafted over the years to try
to avoid this absolute beginning, but none of these theories has
commended itself to the scientific community as more plausible than the
Big Bang theory. In fact, in 2003 Arvind Borde, Alan Guth, and Alexander
Vilenkin were able to prove that any universe which is, on
average, in a state of cosmic expansion cannot be eternal in the past
but must have an absolute beginning. Vilenkin pulls no punches:
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a
proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. With the
proof now in place, cosmologists can no longer hide behind the
possibility of a past-eternal universe. There is no escape, they have to
face the problem of a cosmic beginning.
That problem was nicely captured by Anthony Kenny of Oxford University.
He writes, "A proponent of the Big Bang theory, at least if he is an
atheist, must believe that the universe came from nothing and by
nothing."
But surely that doesn't make sense! Out of nothing, nothing comes. So
why does the universe exist instead of just nothing? Where did it come
from? There must have been a cause which brought the universe into
being.
We can summarize our argument thus far as follows:
1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe has a cause.
2. The universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the universe has a cause.
Given the truth of the two premises, the conclusion necessarily follows.
This isn't really an argument for God's existence; rather it's the
claim that you can know God exists wholly apart from arguments simply by
immediately experiencing him. This was the way people in the Bible knew
God, as professor John Hick explains:
God was known to them as a dynamic will interacting with their own
wills, a sheer given reality, as inescapably to be reckoned with as
destructive storm and life-giving sunshine . . . They did not think of
God as an inferred entity but as an experienced reality. To them God was
not . . . an idea adopted by the mind, but an experiential reality
which gave significance to their lives.
Philosophers call beliefs like this "properly basic beliefs." They
aren't based on some other beliefs; rather they are part of the
foundation of a person's system of beliefs. Other properly basic beliefs
would be the belief in the reality of the past, the existence of the
external world, and the presence of other minds like your own. When you
think about it, none of these beliefs can be proved. How could you prove
that the world was not created five minutes ago with built-in
appearances of age like food in our stomachs from the breakfasts we
never really ate and memory traces in our brains of events we never
really experienced? How could you prove that you are not a brain in a
vat of chemicals being stimulated with electrodes by some mad scientist
to believe that you are here listening to this lecture? How could you
prove that other people are not really androids who exhibit all the
external behavior of persons with minds, when in reality they are
soulless, robot-like entities?
Although these sorts of beliefs
are basic for us, that doesn't mean that they're arbitrary. Rather they
are grounded in the sense that they're formed in the context of certain
experiences. In the experiential context of seeing and feeling and
hearing things, I naturally form the belief that there are certain
physical objects which I am sensing. Thus, my basic beliefs are not
arbitrary, but appropriately grounded in experience. There may be no way
to prove such beliefs, and yet it is perfectly rational to hold them.
You'd have to be crazy to think that the world was created five minutes
ago or to believe that you are a brain in a vat! Such beliefs are thus
not merely basic, but properly basic.
In the same way, belief in God is for those who seek Him a properly basic belief grounded in our experience of God.
We can summarize this consideration as follows:
1. Beliefs which are appropriately grounded may be rationally accepted as basic beliefs not grounded on argument.
2. Belief that the biblical God exists is appropriately grounded.
3. Therefore, belief that the biblical God exists may be rationally accepted as a basic belief not grounded on argument.
2. Belief that the biblical God exists is appropriately grounded.
3. Therefore, belief that the biblical God exists may be rationally accepted as a basic belief not grounded on argument.
Now if this is right, then there's a danger that arguments for the
existence of God could actually distract one's attention from God
Himself. If you're sincerely seeking God, God will make His existence
evident to you. The Bible says, "draw near to God and he will draw near
to you" (James 4.8). We mustn't so
concentrate on the proofs that we fail to hear the inner voice of God
speaking to our heart. For those who listen, God becomes an immediate
reality in their lives.
Does God exist? – Five good reasons to think that God exists
Does God exist? We've seen five good reasons to think that God exists:
1. God makes sense of the origin of the universe.
2. God makes sense of the fine-tuning of the universe for intelligent life.
3. God makes sense of objective moral values in the world.
4. God makes sense of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus.
5. God can be immediately known and experienced.
2. God makes sense of the fine-tuning of the universe for intelligent life.
3. God makes sense of objective moral values in the world.
4. God makes sense of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus.
5. God can be immediately known and experienced.
These are only a part of the evidence for God's existence. Alvin
Plantinga, one of the world's leading philosophers, has laid out two
dozen or so arguments for God's existence. Together these constitute a powerful cumulative case for the existence of God.
Therefore, I think that Christian theism is a plausible worldview which
commends itself to the thoughtful consideration of every rational human
being.
Comments
Post a Comment